Skip to content
52

235/60/15

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but weak search conversion (0.3%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 12Growth 58Conversion 3Competition 81Returns 99Price range 13Avg price 53Brand share 84Review moat 61Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great51%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good1,042.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+32.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Good$165.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Bad$36.85–$510.96

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad$46K

$46K/yr · 104K searches

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

22 rising

Sellers

69

Top-5 brand share

51%

Open market

41%

  • Fullway12%
  • Forceum11%
  • Cooper11%
  • HANKOOK9%
  • GRIPMAX9%
  • Accelera8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$1K6%$3K9%$4K12%$6K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 50 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 102 weeks — +32.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Holiday '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wheel Quality32%

“Looks good on the wheels I'm using”

Value For Money28%

“Great tire for the price”

Quality-Overall19%

“Excellent delivery and quality service”

Size-Overall8%

“Fit good”

Tread Pattern Pitch3%

“tread still looking good”

Durability2%

“How well they last remains to be seen”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“Exceeds expectations”

Grip1%

“Good grip attraction would definitely recommend to buy again”

Product Condition1%

“they were new”

Assembly/Installation1%

“And they were very accommodating with installation”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall25%

“size was not good”

Quality-Overall25%

“Poor quality, wouldn't balance when new and have broken belts after less than 500 miles”

Durability8%

“Blew apart”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“False description”

Pressure5%

“latter that same day the tire pressure went low”

Strap/String Quality5%

“the waist belt buckle is cheap and way too small and will fail”

Grip5%

“They do not grip the road like I was expected”

Tread Pattern Pitch2%

“tread blew apart”

Friction2%

“Terrible traction”

Strength2%

“Very flimsy tire”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall76%
Compatibility-Overall7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Functionality-Overall3%
Quality-Overall2%
Value For Money2%
Product Condition1%
Ease Of Use1%
Assembly/Installation0%
Thigh Fit0%