Skip to content
50

235/40/18

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($68.01–$322.75) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 51Growth 41Conversion 20Competition 54Returns 100Price range 13Avg price 61Brand share 50Review moat 65Quality gap 42

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good893.42

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$142.01

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good$290K

$290K/yr · 128K searches

Brand share

Okay75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+12.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$68.01–$322.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

20%

  • Fullway26%
  • Lexani20%
  • Forceum14%
  • Continental8%
  • Aplus6%
  • Ironman5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$14K10%$29K15%$43K20%$58K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +12.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall34%

“Good quality”

Value For Money22%

“Value for money is good”

Wheel Quality18%

“they ride good”

Size-Overall8%

“Fit perfect”

Strength2%

“still going strong with over 35,000 miles”

Maintenance And Repair2%

“Fix really good”

Functionality-Overall2%

“they ride good”

Grip2%

“Grippy in wet conditions”

Correct Contents2%

“Second set perfect”

Friction1%

“Great traction and they look nice”

What buyers complain about

Durability25%

“Questionable reliability”

Smell13%

“Smell of rubber”

Quality-Overall13%

“A lot of reviewers on here expect 5 star nascar level quality on $70 tires”

Size-Overall13%

“Amazon says they wont fit my car”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall69%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Value For Money5%
Compatibility-Overall5%
Functionality-Overall4%
Product Condition4%
Quality-Overall3%
Durability1%
Assembly/Installation1%
Maintenance And Repair1%