Skip to content
49

225/45/17 tires

Skip it

Weak search conversion (1.2%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 54Growth 39Conversion 15Competition 52Returns 100Price range 16Avg price 60Brand share 53Review moat 67Quality gap 30

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good805.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$146.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$364K

$364K/yr · 202K searches

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+11.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Bad$59.47–$316.92

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 flat

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

23%

  • Fullway37%
  • Forceum19%
  • FALKEN8%
  • HANKOOK5%
  • Lionhart4%
  • Landspider4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$18K10%$36K15%$55K20%$73K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +11.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wheel Quality36%

“Great tires”

Quality-Overall26%

“Good quality”

Value For Money22%

“Nice tires for the price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Tires are exactly as advertised”

Durability3%

“durable good treated tires”

Size-Overall3%

“They fit”

Tread Pattern Pitch2%

“Good looking tires, nice, deep tread, a great value for the money”

Grip2%

“Good grip attraction would definitely recommend to buy again”

Comfort-Overall1%

“comfortability”

Friction1%

“Good road grip and traction”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall44%

“Garbage garbage cheap cheap garbage”

Durability17%

“Broke in on 1600 mile trip home”

Pressure11%

“latter that same day the tire pressure went low”

Functionality-Overall11%

“dont do well with potholes”

Assembly/Installation4%

“though the installers did have a little problem mounting them”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall80%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Value For Money3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Quality-Overall1%
Maintenance And Repair1%