Skip to content
51

205/65r15

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but weak search conversion (1.3%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 37Growth 50Conversion 16Competition 59Returns 98Price range 21Avg price 66Brand share 67Review moat 78Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great436.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Good$126.00

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+19.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$184K

$184K/yr · 111K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Bad$49.38–$289.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad1.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

31%

  • Fullway37%
  • Accelera9%
  • Armstrong7%
  • Ironman7%
  • Lexani6%
  • TRAVELSTAR4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$9K10%$18K15%$28K20%$37K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +19.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KPrime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money32%

“Great tires for the price”

Wheel Quality25%

“Good tires for the price thanks”

Quality-Overall15%

“These tires are excellent and affordable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“As advertised”

Friction4%

“great traction”

Size-Overall4%

“Fits good seems to push water out really good”

Tread Pattern Pitch3%

“tread still looking good”

Durability3%

“They are very durable and sturdy, and they fit my car perfectly”

Grip1%

“they handle absolutely great”

Design-Overall1%

“Look good and very good tread design for the price, I would buy them again”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall40%

“Cheap”

Durability29%

“Blow out”

Value For Money14%

“Waste of money”

Friction7%

“lacking in snow/ice traction”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall87%
Compatibility-Overall4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Value For Money4%
Quality-Overall1%
Maintenance And Repair1%