Skip to content
55

2 stroke oil measuring cup

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 71% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 37Growth 74Conversion 88Competition 24Returns 97Price range 43Avg price 65Brand share 50Review moat 55Quality gap 35

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Good+58.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Good$13.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,299.82

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay$6.00–$21.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Okay$184K

$184K/yr · 129K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad71%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 71% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

16 flat

Sellers

111

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

21%

  • KAMTEC24%
  • attwood24%
  • MEASURE RIGHT12%
  • Samorillo9%
  • Maxima6%
  • Turnah4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$18K20%$37K30%$55K40%$74K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +58.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use23%

“Easy to read”

Quality-Overall17%

“Good product, provides accurate mix ratio”

Advertised Vs Actual Product17%

“As described”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy11%

“Excellent for measuring”

Value For Money5%

“WORTH IT”

Strength4%

“Solid container”

Size-Overall4%

“Great size”

Efficiency4%

“Works as expected, clear markings and pours well”

Durability2%

“Durable”

Mixing/Blending1%

“Easy to mix”

What buyers complain about

Measurement/Reading Accuracy21%

“Inaccurate markings”

Quality-Overall16%

“Poor Quality”

Leak-Proof12%

“LEAKS”

Size-Overall11%

“large measuring jug”

Value For Money9%

“Over Priced”

Product Condition3%

“like the product was used”

Durability3%

“Last about a year”

Print Quality3%

“Printing on bottle is inaccurate makes for poor ratios”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“American made...but the conversion chart doesnt show GALLONS!!”

Strength3%

“Appears to be very brittle”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall55%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy7%
Value For Money5%
Leak-Proof4%
Handle Quality3%
Material Quality3%
Functionality-Overall3%
Quality-Overall2%
Durability1%