Skip to content
53

18x7.50-8 lawn mower tire

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +117.7% this quarter, but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 71% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 25Growth 95Conversion 54Competition 24Returns 95Price range 64Avg price 82Brand share 28Review moat 47Quality gap 42

Growth

Incredible+117.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$79.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$36.34–$136.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay1,816

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$102K

$102K/yr · 29K searches

Competition

Bad71%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 71% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

7%

  • MaxAuto28%
  • TUFFIOM21%
  • WANDA19%
  • AR-PRO11%
  • Deestone9%
  • MOTOOS5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$10K20%$20K30%$31K40%$41K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 44 weeks — +117.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26Sep '25Oct '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money27%

“well worth it”

Size-Overall26%

“Fit great”

Quality-Overall18%

“good looking tires”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“Got the job done”

Wheel Quality7%

“I enjoy these tires as they are beefy and actually dependable”

Durability2%

“if theyre as durable as they are pretty”

Assembly/Installation2%

“Easy to install and cost effective”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall30%

“A tad to wide”

Quality-Overall11%

“Tires are cheaply made”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Wrong advertizement for the product I received”

Natural Resource Wastage5%

“Complete waste”

Material Quality5%

“I was initially worried they would look plastic and wrong,”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Didn't work on my hustler raptor”

Smell5%

“This stinks”

Flatness5%

“Tire suddenly went flat”

Durability5%

“they no longer hold air after 2 months”

Weight Heavy5%

“They are quite bulky to ship”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall68%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Assembly/Installation5%
Functionality-Overall3%
Value For Money3%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Mechanism Issues1%
Pressure1%
Quality-Overall1%