Skip to content
45

yupo paper

Skip it

Soft demand (-5.6% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 24Growth 22Conversion 76Competition 32Returns 95Price range 53Avg price 92Brand share 24Review moat 74Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$21.92

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good538.94

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$5.87–$167.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad$96K

$96K/yr · 61K searches

Brand share

Bad90%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-5.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

38

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

6%

  • Legion32%
  • Pixiss27%
  • GR DZPLUS17%
  • ET CETERA PAPERS7%
  • Ranger7%
  • Bright Creations4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$10K20%$19K30%$29K40%$38K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -5.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money22%

“Not bad for the money”

Color11%

“The colors glide on it”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“As advertised”

Paper Quality11%

“Luxurious feel to paper”

Efficiency9%

“works well”

Ease Of Use6%

“it was very easy to work with”

Paper Compatibility6%

“Found I great for making cards as well as full sized images as cut in half is perfect to make two 5x7 cards”

Paper Brightness6%

“Its thick shiny”

Quality-Overall4%

“Good quality”

Ease Of Cleaning4%

“It works just the same and as well and wipes clean”

What buyers complain about

Thickness25%

“Thin”

Functionality-Overall17%

“Doesn't work with alcohol ink at all”

Absorbency8%

“The description says non-absorbent”

Value For Money8%

“pricey”

Hard Feel8%

“Hard, slick surface”

Moist/Dry8%

“Like a thin dry”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“The description says non-absorbent”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall52%
Value For Money18%
Paper Quality6%
Weight Heavy3%
Paint Quality3%
Compatibility-Overall3%
Functionality-Overall3%
Smell3%
Color3%
Thin2%