Skip to content
53

wood burning stencils

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 45% of clicks), but soft demand (-27.9% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 25Growth 11Conversion 30Competition 77Returns 89Price range 80Avg price 75Brand share 90Review moat 65Quality gap 43

Brand share

Great45%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$7.23–$47.62

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$15.15

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good899.6

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay2.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$100K

$100K/yr · 281K searches

Growth

Bad-27.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

31 falling

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

45%

Open market

48%

  • Lewtemi12%
  • Piriuuo11%
  • SUNVERSE9%
  • Yanroom7%
  • Yazhiji7%
  • eageus7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$3K6%$6K9%$9K12%$12K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -27.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
12K8KBlack Friday '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“Excellent product”

Ease Of Use15%

“easy to handle”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As advertised”

Value For Money8%

“Worth it”

Design-Overall5%

“Cute designs”

Fun/Entertainment Experience4%

“Fun for the kids and the grownups”

Wood Quality4%

“Works great on any wood”

Efficiency4%

“Works great, make sure to burn in well ventilated area, the outcome is amazing”

Strength3%

“Its sturdy”

Gifting Purpose3%

“It can be a great gift as well”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall14%

“This item did not work as expected”

Size-Overall11%

“the jar is tiny”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Not as advertised”

Thickness5%

“the paste seems to be a little thick”

Wood Quality4%

“Its not like a true wood burning that is subtractive”

Color4%

“Some areas can come out darker than others if youre not consistent”

Paint Quality4%

“My mistake was that this was listed as paste and not paint”

Quality-Overall4%

“Stencils were just ok. Most were ok to use, several were mispronounced and could not be.”

Heating3%

“It will brown as it heats up”

Ease Of Use3%

“Its very hard to use”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall41%
Functionality-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Wood Quality5%
Value For Money4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Adhesion/Stickiness3%
Paint Quality3%
Heating2%
Quality-Overall2%