Skip to content
56

tan cardstock

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 51% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 42Conversion 82Competition 81Returns 79Price range 57Avg price 57Brand share 84Review moat 74Quality gap 23

Brand share

Great51%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Conversion

Great8.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Great1.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good535.2

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$12.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.25–$28.18

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+13.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$31K

$31K/yr · 28K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

28 falling

Sellers

78

Top-5 brand share

51%

Open market

43%

  • Goefun23%
  • Topeen8%
  • Neenah8%
  • KIVTFF6%
  • SUMERX6%
  • FloraSea6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$6124%$1K6%$2K8%$2K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 30 weeks — +13.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
600400Spike '26Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall22%

“Good Value, Quality Card Stock”

Paper Quality15%

“Good craft paper”

Color11%

“the color is beautiful”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“Did its job”

Value For Money5%

“Worth the price”

Print Quality4%

“Great looking - Easy to print on”

Thickness4%

“I finally found cardstock in the exact thickness Ive been looking for”

Weight Heavy3%

“Nice heavy to use as card bases”

Strength2%

“it's sturdy”

Durability2%

“very durable”

What buyers complain about

Color20%

“Color not as described”

Thickness13%

“While I knew they were slightly thicker than the paper that I usually use”

Paper Quality8%

“the paper is thin”

Print Quality5%

“But this paper was terrible quality for printing”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Dont go on the pictures”

Jamming/Clogging4%

“Jams every time”

Quality-Overall3%

“which makes it look noticeably lower quality”

Ease Of Use3%

“Cant use it”

Paper Brightness2%

“The paper is definitely yellow not ivory or cream”

Weight Light2%

“It not heavyweight at all”

Top return reasons

Color36%
Paper Quality14%
Size-Overall7%
Value For Money5%
Paper Brightness5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Display Colors5%
Thickness5%
Thin2%
Weight Heavy2%