Skip to content
42

sublimation puzzle blanks

Skip it

Soft demand (-34.6% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 14Growth 8Conversion 47Competition 40Returns 83Price range 76Avg price 83Brand share 49Review moat 84Quality gap 32

Review moat

Great329.27

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$18.39

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.62–$39.28

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay3.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Okay61%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$55K

$55K/yr · 80K searches

Growth

Bad-34.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 61% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

15

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

17%

  • MS WGO36%
  • Dduolammng17%
  • Sumind8%
  • Tlence8%
  • KOALA PAPER7%
  • JAPCHET7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$3K10%$6K15%$8K20%$11K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -34.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Black Friday '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall27%

“Amazing quality”

Gifting Purpose19%

“Great gift”

Fun/Entertainment Experience14%

“Hours of entertainment”

Color9%

“great color”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Better than expected”

Size-Overall4%

“Perfect Size”

Value For Money4%

“super affordable”

Creativity3%

“This is a great buy for art, teachers, or parents with crafty kids”

Efficiency2%

“Works perfect”

Material Quality2%

“Excellent material”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall15%

“wrong size advertised”

Assembly/Installation15%

“A few of the edge pieces were still barely attached”

Shape/Style15%

“all the same shape”

Quality-Overall13%

“Very disappointed in this puzzle very poor quality”

Material Quality9%

“the quality of the cardboard feels a bit thin”

Defective Material/Parts5%

“Defective pieces”

Functionality-Overall5%

“They do not press”

Durability4%

“would not hold up to much usage”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“NOT A5--MISLEADING DESCRIPTION”

Strength3%

“Very flimsy”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall48%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Value For Money6%
Quality-Overall6%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Functionality-Overall4%
Strength3%
Thin3%
Material Quality3%
Durability3%