Skip to content
50

shape stencils

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.0%), but a small market ($62K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 15Growth 19Conversion 45Competition 76Returns 95Price range 57Avg price 39Brand share 92Review moat 64Quality gap 23

Returns

Incredible1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great43%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good943.08

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$4.51–$29.11

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Okay3.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Okay$10.72

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-12.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$62K

$62K/yr · 161K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

44 falling

Sellers

82

Top-5 brand share

43%

Open market

52%

  • Tamaki10%
  • Tenare9%
  • BetyBedy9%
  • Angrox9%
  • IPXEAD6%
  • Nicpro5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$2K6%$4K9%$6K12%$7K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 52 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 31 weeks — -12.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KDec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Excellent product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product14%

“Exactly as pictured”

Value For Money13%

“Great value for the money”

Design-Overall8%

“Love the designs”

Ease Of Use7%

“So handy”

Size-Overall5%

“Good size”

Strength5%

“Good sturdy plastic/nice little template”

Drawing Experience4%

“Perfect for drawing”

Shape/Style4%

“Good variety of circle shapes”

Thickness3%

“The box its stored in is nice thick quality”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“Very small”

Quality-Overall12%

“Low quality”

Thickness7%

“Too thick”

Strength6%

“Kind of flimsy”

Material Quality5%

“I know its also typical of cheap plastic”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy5%

“I don't know the accuracy of any of the proposed measurements in the tools”

Flexibility4%

“they bend easily”

Functionality-Overall4%

“I broke several graphite leads because it constantly shifts on the paper”

Durability3%

“break easily”

Thin3%

“Thin”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall39%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Strength7%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Value For Money6%
Thin5%
Material Quality5%
Quality-Overall5%
Shape/Style4%
Functionality-Overall3%