Skip to content
59

scrapbook paper 12x12

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 31% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 53Growth 22Conversion 29Competition 95Returns 92Price range 58Avg price 54Brand share 96Review moat 74Quality gap 24

Brand share

Incredible31%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great20%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good542.54

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$4.78–$29.28

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$12.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$344K

$344K/yr · 1.2M searches

Conversion

Okay2.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-6.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (20% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

77 rising

Sellers

102

Top-5 brand share

31%

Open market

66%

  • MIATTCLD10%
  • iKammo8%
  • Neenah5%
  • Fabllewavi4%
  • Lily Craft4%
  • Desecraft3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$7K4%$14K6%$21K8%$27K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 131 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -6.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Paper Quality14%

“Beautiful Paper”

Quality-Overall14%

“Great quality affordable”

Color10%

“Beautiful Colors”

Adhesion/Stickiness9%

“Sticks well”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Value For Money6%

“Not expensive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Exactly as pictured”

Design-Overall4%

“Beautiful design”

Thickness3%

“They have a decent thickness and smooth texture”

Print Quality2%

“Beautiful print”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness15%

“bad adhesive”

Size-Overall11%

“Super small”

Thickness7%

“Not as thick as I would have liked”

Paper Quality7%

“Small and paper quality is thin”

Quality-Overall6%

“Low quality”

Durability6%

“Break so easily”

Value For Money5%

“Very disappointed for the price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Very misleading”

Color3%

“Looks pretty faded”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Didnt work well”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall34%
Adhesion/Stickiness15%
Paper Quality8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Value For Money7%
Color6%
Functionality-Overall4%
Paper Brightness2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Display Colors2%