Skip to content
44

scrapbook pages

Skip it

Soft demand (-9.8% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 25Growth 20Conversion 79Competition 45Returns 68Price range 65Avg price 78Brand share 36Review moat 60Quality gap 23

Conversion

Great8.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$16.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Good2.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Good$6.33–$31.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,102.57

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$100K

$100K/yr · 78K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-9.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

12%

  • Vmiapxo30%
  • Dunwell27%
  • Vienrose13%
  • zandfelo7%
  • LJLGSZY6%
  • tutata4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$4K8%$8K12%$12K16%$16K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall33%

“Exceptional quality”

Value For Money13%

“Decent price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“The product is as advertised”

Size-Overall12%

“They fit my album well”

Durability4%

“Seem durable”

Thickness3%

“The protectors are sturdy and good thickness, providing exactly what I need”

Weight Light3%

“Very light and perfect for my scrapbook”

Efficiency3%

“works fine”

Paper Compatibility2%

“they even fit the 12 by 12 paper better than the Pioneer brand ones”

Strength1%

“seem sturdy enough to hold up over time”

What buyers complain about

Advertised Vs Actual Product25%

“Very poor description”

Size-Overall21%

“Big”

Thickness8%

“not as thick”

Paper Compatibility8%

“This last box of 12x12 wasn't cut wide enough for the paper to slide into”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor quality”

Weight Light4%

“Not heavyweight”

Value For Money4%

“a rip off for the price”

Refills-Overall4%

“These are not Refill Pages”

Print Quality3%

“Pages are not clear”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting3%

“It was probably my mistake that I didnt read the directions”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall66%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Thin5%
Value For Money5%
Compatibility-Overall2%
Quality-Overall2%
Material Quality2%
Functionality-Overall1%
Thickness1%
Strength1%