Skip to content
50

pink cardstock

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.6%), but soft demand (-42.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 29Growth 4Conversion 75Competition 77Returns 82Price range 63Avg price 53Brand share 67Review moat 74Quality gap 19

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Conversion

Great7.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good545.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$5.72–$31.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$12.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Okay$127K

$127K/yr · 147K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-42.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 falling

Sellers

80

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

30%

  • Astrobrights18%
  • TUXIYA16%
  • Goefun12%
  • FLIPPED11%
  • Pikalon8%
  • Topeen6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$4K6%$8K9%$11K12%$15K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -42.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color23%

“Colors are great”

Paper Quality14%

“This was nice thick paper”

Quality-Overall13%

“Great product for Amazon”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As advertised”

Thickness8%

“The cards took is just the right thickness”

Print Quality4%

“Great color and easy to print on”

Paper Brightness4%

“Good quality color paper”

Durability2%

“Very durable”

Brightness/Shine/Glow2%

“Very bright”

Value For Money2%

“Good value for the money”

What buyers complain about

Color33%

“Not the pink that is pictured at all”

Thickness7%

“Not thick”

Paper Quality6%

“NOT VELLUM PAPER”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“I ordered this for an event and when I opened it it was this bright pink, not at all like the light pink in the image, false advertising”

Functionality-Overall3%

“Won't feed through printer”

Size-Overall3%

“Smaller than expected”

Dispensing Mechanism3%

“Won't feed through printer”

Weight Light3%

“Not as heavy weighted like I thought”

Display Colors3%

“There is much less variation between the colors in the paper I received than what I see from other customers”

Value For Money2%

“My only complaint would be that it seems a bit high priced for 100 sheets in today's economy”

Top return reasons

Color41%
Size-Overall12%
Value For Money10%
Paper Quality10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Display Colors4%
Paper Brightness4%
Thickness2%
Thin2%
Brightness/Shine/Glow1%