Skip to content
55

picture framing supplies

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 50% of clicks), but soft demand (-9.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 21Growth 20Conversion 65Competition 77Returns 83Price range 52Avg price 81Brand share 85Review moat 70Quality gap 38

Brand share

Great50%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$17.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good692.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$4.78–$167.90

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$84K

$84K/yr · 84K searches

Growth

Bad-9.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

36 falling

Sellers

75

Top-5 brand share

50%

Open market

45%

  • 888 Corp15%
  • E.H.C.11%
  • Feekoon11%
  • Picture Hang Solutions7%
  • NORTHLINE5%
  • Anrain5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$3K6%$5K9%$8K12%$10K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 52 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KBlack Friday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use17%

“Easy to apply”

Quality-Overall16%

“Excellent product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As advertised”

Value For Money11%

“reasonable price”

Strength6%

“well built”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“Adhesion is strong”

Size-Overall4%

“it fit perfectly”

Assembly/Installation2%

“They are easy to mount and sturdy”

Design-Overall2%

“Built well”

Efficiency2%

“Does the job well”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness13%

“the adhesive is sticky”

Size-Overall11%

“Really small”

Quality-Overall8%

“Clearly failed quality control”

Functionality-Overall7%

“These Barely Work”

Ease Of Use7%

“Difficult to work”

Strength7%

“Springs are too weak”

Durability6%

“Broke right away”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting6%

“The included page of instructions is minimal and poorly translated”

Value For Money3%

“Spend a little more money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Does not work as advertised”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall35%
Functionality-Overall13%
Adhesion/Stickiness10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Value For Money4%
Compatibility-Overall3%
Mechanism Issues3%
Strength3%
Quality-Overall3%