Skip to content
53

pattern paper

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($23.08 avg), but soft demand (-3.5% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 51Growth 23Conversion 63Competition 43Returns 91Price range 81Avg price 95Brand share 55Review moat 66Quality gap 24

Avg price

Incredible$23.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$5.69–$58.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good865.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good$290K

$290K/yr · 227K searches

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-3.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 falling

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

23%

  • MONTADA BY LA LULI22%
  • Prudiut19%
  • ANIKJOY18%
  • Tritart7%
  • Mood Designer Fabrics6%
  • Epakh6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$14K10%$29K15%$43K20%$58K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall15%

“Great quality, arrived in good condition, looks like image, and good price for size”

Ease Of Use11%

“Easy to use”

Stitch/Finish/Polish10%

“Easy removal while stitching”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“As advertised”

Value For Money9%

“Excellent price”

Durability5%

“have held up well so far”

Thickness5%

“has a nice sort of halfway between thin cardboard and construction paper”

Size-Overall5%

“This fit the bill perfectly”

Strength4%

“It is sturdy”

Efficiency3%

“Works great”

What buyers complain about

Thickness16%

“paper is very thin”

Size-Overall11%

“is bigger than I expected”

Durability7%

“durability are all terrible”

Value For Money6%

“on the pricey side”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“its frustrating that they didnt send the correct 24 pages as advertised twice”

Weight Heavy4%

“a little heavy for my purposes”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy3%

“I would not count on the marks for measuring. in or metric”

Thin3%

“Too thin”

Strength3%

“Break easy”

Color2%

“The brown color can make pencil markings slightly harder to see under dim lighting”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall52%
Value For Money12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Color5%
Thin3%
Quality-Overall2%
Thickness2%
Paper Quality2%
Material Quality2%
Functionality-Overall2%