Skip to content
57

paint thinner

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 40Growth 52Conversion 75Competition 47Returns 97Price range 62Avg price 71Brand share 53Review moat 47Quality gap 45

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Good7.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$14.49

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$3.32–$33.83

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Good+23.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay57%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,794.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$207K

$207K/yr · 204K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 57% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 rising

Sellers

77

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

23%

  • Sunnyside Corporation25%
  • KLEAN-STRIP23%
  • Max Strip10%
  • Bellisinno9%
  • WM BARR & COMPANY5%
  • Nanoskin4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$8K8%$17K12%$25K16%$33K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +23.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Advertised Vs Actual Product15%

“As described”

Quality-Overall13%

“Very good product helpful”

Paint Quality12%

“Works especially well on citadel paints”

Efficiency10%

“Works ok”

Smell8%

“Doesnt stink”

Ease Of Use6%

“easy to store”

Value For Money5%

“Good price”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“it helps me clean my brushes”

Thickness4%

“It's always good to have some of this Vallejo thinner to bring life back to those thickened paints”

Size-Overall2%

“The 100ml size is convenient”

What buyers complain about

Paint Quality29%

“Did not work on my paint”

Functionality-Overall21%

“Works barely”

Thickness7%

“He says it is way thinned down”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“cleaning it up was horrifying”

Quality-Overall5%

“Poor quality”

Value For Money5%

“its far too expensive. not that I found anything cheaper”

Smell4%

“it smells so strong”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“NOT AS ADVERTISED”

Ease Of Use2%

“hard to work with”

Defective Material/Parts1%

“Product does not work”

Top return reasons

Paint Quality30%
Functionality-Overall17%
Leak-Proof12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Size-Overall7%
Value For Money5%
Thickness4%
Spray/Flow4%
Thin3%
Defective Material/Parts2%