Skip to content
54

paint pad

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but a small market ($53K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 13Growth 25Conversion 52Competition 75Returns 96Price range 52Avg price 68Brand share 69Review moat 59Quality gap 60

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good40%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good64%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Good$14.19

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,154.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good4.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$5.76–$25.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-0.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$53K

$53K/yr · 87K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 40% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

76

Top-5 brand share

64%

Open market

32%

  • Voomey29%
  • SHUR-LINE17%
  • Hapikalor8%
  • ROLLINGDOG5%
  • Strathmore5%
  • NANJA4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$2K8%$4K12%$6K16%$9K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 37 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 82 weeks — -0.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KPrime Day '25Spike '25JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Sep, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall15%

“All the pieces it comes with are well made”

Drawing Experience10%

“Great for drawing”

Value For Money9%

“Best value”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Paint Quality7%

“These are ample for any paint job”

Size-Overall6%

“The 9 x 12 size is ideal”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Cleaning4%

“which helps keep things cleaner overall”

Gifting Purpose4%

“Gift”

Efficiency4%

“Worked nice for small spaces”

What buyers complain about

Paint Quality17%

“Not for paint”

Thickness12%

“No thicker than xerox paper”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor quality control”

Functionality-Overall6%

“does not work well”

Ease Of Use6%

“Hard to work with”

Durability5%

“The thing fell apart quickly”

Color5%

“It looks a little off white”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“fake advertisement”

Size-Overall3%

“Did not fit well”

Paper Quality2%

“This is inferior paper for wet media”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall35%
Paint Quality13%
Value For Money12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Functionality-Overall5%
Quality-Overall3%
Color2%
Material Quality2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Thin2%