Skip to content
52

navy blue cardstock

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (9.4% search→purchase), but a small market ($43K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 11Growth 64Conversion 85Competition 59Returns 64Price range 44Avg price 40Brand share 71Review moat 72Quality gap 25

Conversion

Great9.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good616.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Good+42.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay$5.41–$22.53

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay$10.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$43K

$43K/yr · 42K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

74

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

31%

  • Sylroal22%
  • Goefun15%
  • Vishoitty9%
  • Uncle Paul9%
  • Yezinie8%
  • Silunkia6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$4K20%$9K30%$13K40%$17K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 10 weeks — +42.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KMay '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color32%

“Beautiful color”

Quality-Overall22%

“Good quality card stock”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“As advertized”

Paper Quality9%

“strong paper”

Paper Brightness8%

“the paper Stock arrived in excellent condition”

Thickness4%

“not too thin”

Print Quality2%

“prints on well”

Drawing Experience2%

“Awesome for crafting”

Weight Light2%

“Light weight paper”

Size-Overall2%

“Nice size”

What buyers complain about

Color33%

“Color was not accurate”

Paper Quality13%

“felt a lot more like construction paper than cardstock”

Strength10%

“Flimsy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“Description said cardstock but product is construction paper quality. Potentially good for other uses but not cardstock.”

Size-Overall10%

“One set of 25 has some that are trimmed smaller”

Ease Of Cleaning10%

“More difficult to get a clean cut”

Sharpness3%

“it frayed when cut with a new blade”

Paper Brightness3%

“felt a lot more like construction paper than cardstock”

Weight Light3%

“This is a bit lighter than expected”

Top return reasons

Color37%
Size-Overall14%
Paper Quality11%
Value For Money7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Thin4%
Thickness3%
Display Colors3%
Weight Heavy3%
Paper Brightness3%