Skip to content
51

mulberry paper

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (176 avg reviews), but a small market ($98K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 25Growth 31Conversion 51Competition 58Returns 91Price range 74Avg price 79Brand share 48Review moat 91Quality gap 30

Review moat

Great175.93

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$16.75

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.96–$40.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good4.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Okay+4.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$98K

$98K/yr · 144K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

20%

  • Kozo Studio30%
  • FIVEIZERO24%
  • DUONGJAIS BRAND11%
  • RATREE 8886%
  • Prudiut5%
  • NaRaOn HanJi4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$10K20%$20K30%$29K40%$39K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +4.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall24%

“Really great assortment”

Color10%

“I love the colors”

Value For Money7%

“Great price”

Paper Quality7%

“Beautiful Paper”

Texture/Consistency-Overall7%

“Beautiful semi-transparent texture”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Design-Overall5%

“These designs really spark the creative juices in their wonderful designs”

Thickness3%

“This is the perfect thickness”

Size-Overall3%

“its nearly a perfect fit”

Print Quality3%

“You can print on them”

What buyers complain about

Thickness16%

“thicker than expected”

Size-Overall8%

“The sheets are also on the smaller side”

Quality-Overall8%

“Garbage”

Strength7%

“Delicate”

Color5%

“I was expecting to receive more color choices, like on the product picture. white, beige and brown.”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“wont let the gold leave stick without serious finessing”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“One thing I was hoping for was duplicates of each design”

Value For Money3%

“not enough for the Price”

Paint Quality2%

“bad for painting”

Moist/Dry2%

“pieces were put in not fully dry”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall19%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Paper Quality10%
Thin9%
Color8%
Thickness5%
Quality-Overall5%
Functionality-Overall4%
Material Quality4%
Value For Money4%