Skip to content
50

modeling paste

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.0%), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 67% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 33Conversion 65Competition 30Returns 95Price range 58Avg price 70Brand share 46Review moat 41Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good$14.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$7.25–$25.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$359K

$359K/yr · 428K searches

Brand share

Okay78%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,365.89

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+6.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 flat

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

78%

Open market

19%

  • BLUEBIRD37%
  • Nicpro16%
  • Liquitex11%
  • Endhokn9%
  • Handy Art4%
  • Nariolar3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$36K20%$72K30%$108K40%$144K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +6.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use13%

“Easy to use”

Texture/Consistency-Overall12%

“Good texture”

Paint Quality11%

“paint goes right over it without any issues at all”

Quality-Overall8%

“Good Quality”

Smell7%

“It doesn't smell bad”

Value For Money4%

“So it's a good value for the money”

Soft Feel4%

“Goes on very smooth”

Efficiency3%

“It works well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“This product works as advertised”

Moist/Dry3%

“It dries well and works well”

What buyers complain about

Thickness12%

“The paste itself is extremely thick”

Smell6%

“THIS PRODUCT HAS VERY STRONG ODOR”

Value For Money6%

“Just expensive”

Moist/Dry5%

“Some was already dried out”

Size-Overall5%

“The jar is fairly large”

Paint Quality4%

“it doesnt blend well with the paint”

Shape/Style2%

“it was just too runny to hold its shape on its own”

Hard Feel2%

“The stuff was very hard, in case that made it even harder to distribute in hands and hair”

Brightness/Shine/Glow2%

“doesnt make it look super shiny”

Leak-Proof2%

“It leaked out all over box nothing to return”

Top return reasons

Texture/Consistency-Overall15%
Smell9%
Leak-Proof9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Size-Overall6%
Value For Money6%
Suitability Short Hair5%
Moist/Dry5%
Functionality-Overall5%
Adhesion/Stickiness4%