Skip to content
51

mini sketchbook

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but a small market ($86K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 22Growth 24Conversion 58Competition 72Returns 94Price range 75Avg price 42Brand share 77Review moat 47Quality gap 23

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great58%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Great$4.32–$47.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good4.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay1,810.47

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay$10.98

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-2.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$86K

$86K/yr · 159K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

27 falling

Sellers

62

Top-5 brand share

58%

Open market

37%

  • Prudiut22%
  • DSTELIN11%
  • Pentalic11%
  • Fuxi7%
  • Animusphere6%
  • Shuttle Art5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$3K6%$5K9%$8K12%$10K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 38 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -2.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“Affordable quality”

Size-Overall16%

“I love the size of these”

Drawing Experience9%

“Great little drawing pads”

Paper Quality9%

“Thick paper”

Value For Money8%

“Great value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Portability4%

“easily portable”

Durability4%

“Very durable”

Color3%

“Love the color”

Gifting Purpose2%

“Birthday Gift”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall24%

“awkward size”

Paper Quality16%

“Flimsy Paper”

Quality-Overall9%

“Not quality”

Thickness9%

“Its thick”

Durability5%

“They rip easily”

Value For Money2%

“I wish they were a little cheaper”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Misleading Pictures”

Product Condition1%

“it arrived used”

Strength1%

“cheap and flimsy”

Color1%

“Probably not wet-on-wet watercolor”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall69%
Paper Quality7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Value For Money4%
Quality-Overall3%
Thin2%
Thickness2%
Strength1%
Weight Heavy1%
Color1%