Skip to content
52

masking fluid

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but soft demand (-7.9% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 21Conversion 94Competition 26Returns 97Price range 43Avg price 64Brand share 49Review moat 65Quality gap 47

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good880.07

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$13.63

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$373K

$373K/yr · 234K searches

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay$8.85–$19.55

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-7.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

44

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

20%

  • Winsor & Newton40%
  • Liquitex11%
  • DANIEL SMITH10%
  • LANGXINST10%
  • 1DFAUL5%
  • Moshify4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$37K20%$75K30%$112K40%$149K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -7.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '24Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use19%

“Easy to use”

Quality-Overall10%

“Excellent product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“As advertised”

Paint Quality10%

“Great for masking off parts of painting”

Efficiency8%

“Masking Fluid works great”

Value For Money6%

“Great Value”

Color4%

“Perfect for watercolors 10/10”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“getting the surface perfectly clean during removal”

Quick Drying3%

“it didn't take forever to dry”

Paper Quality2%

“No tears and no staining on white Watercolor paper”

What buyers complain about

Ease Of Use14%

“VERY hard to remove”

Moist/Dry13%

“Dried up completely”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Didnt work well”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“The glue does not come out in an even flow”

Color4%

“I wish it has some color tint to it”

Thickness3%

“Arrived thick and unusable”

Value For Money3%

“Not worth your time and money”

Paint Quality3%

“covered everything up BUT pulled A TON of color from the painting”

Quality-Overall3%

“It's not indicative of high quality or health compliance”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting3%

“it doesn't come with instructions”

Top return reasons

Moist/Dry19%
Color12%
Leak-Proof9%
Functionality-Overall9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Ease Of Use5%
Value For Money3%
Color Fading/Discoloration3%
Material Quality3%
Size-Overall3%