Skip to content
51

liquid plastic

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($29.67 avg), but soft demand (+0.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 25Conversion 52Competition 70Returns 94Price range 75Avg price 95Brand share 35Review moat 33Quality gap 50

Avg price

Incredible$29.67

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great$6.41–$120.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good4.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay3,201.29

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$108K

$108K/yr · 86K searches

Growth

Okay+0.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

81

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

13%

  • Smooth-On53%
  • EUPHENG10%
  • J-B Weld9%
  • Smooth-On, Inc.8%
  • LET'S RESIN4%
  • FGCI3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$5K10%$11K15%$16K20%$22K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +0.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“Reliable product that does exactly what it promises”

Ease Of Use14%

“Easy to work with”

Efficiency8%

“did work”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Adhesion/Stickiness7%

“Good stick”

Value For Money5%

“Reasonably priced”

Material Quality4%

“Nice material”

Durability4%

“Having a reliable”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting4%

“The instructions are clear”

Strength4%

“It holds strongly on rigid surfaces”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness10%

“Not good adhesion”

Value For Money9%

“It is a little pricey”

Functionality-Overall8%

“all with negative results”

Durability5%

“the durability is poor”

Leak-Proof5%

“Arrived leaking”

Ease Of Use5%

“Hard to use”

Size-Overall4%

“But I didnt understand the sizing”

Quality-Overall4%

“Garbage”

Strength4%

“Weak hold”

Smell3%

“Horrible smell too”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall17%
Adhesion/Stickiness14%
Leak-Proof11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Material Quality9%
Size-Overall8%
Value For Money8%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Color3%
Maintenance And Repair2%