Skip to content
53

green wrapping paper

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 47% of clicks), but soft demand (-10.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 53Growth 20Conversion 62Competition 78Returns 55Price range 35Avg price 33Brand share 88Review moat 61Quality gap 33

Brand share

Great47%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Conversion

Good5.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,040.36

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good$351K

$351K/yr · 649K searches

Price range

Okay$5.96–$19.83

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay$9.98

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-10.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

28

Top-5 brand share

47%

Open market

46%

  • Iioscre12%
  • PH PERKHOMY10%
  • woric10%
  • NESCCI8%
  • SMART&CASUAL7%
  • Aimyoo7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$14K8%$28K12%$42K16%$56K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -10.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
80K60KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 19.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall22%

“The quality is very good; it's thick”

Color19%

“vibrant color”

Thickness8%

“Loved even though the roll was shorter it was thick enough of a roll to wrap a lot of items”

Ease Of Use5%

“Easy to use”

Value For Money5%

“Worth the price”

Size-Overall5%

“Great size”

Gifting Purpose5%

“Useful for a variety of gifts”

Design-Overall4%

“Very nice design”

Durability4%

“Cute and Durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“It works as advertised”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall38%

“very short”

Thickness9%

“It is a thicker paper”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“another type of adhesive needs to be used”

Ease Of Use4%

“which can make it a bit more difficult to use”

Material Quality3%

“Cheap material”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“The advertisement needs to be more clear”

Value For Money2%

“Not worth the price”

Gifting Purpose1%

“makes the finished gift look terrible”

Color1%

“Not the right color”

Smell1%

“But my first customer that got the there item packed with this complained of a moldy smell”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall66%
Color13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Value For Money6%
Thin2%
Material Quality1%
Quality-Overall1%
Thickness1%
Functionality-Overall1%
Display Colors1%