Skip to content
57

eye black colors

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 9Growth 91Conversion 67Competition 45Returns 96Price range 69Avg price 78Brand share 48Review moat 33Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+100.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$16.15

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.85–$35.23

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay3,168.27

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$37K

$37K/yr · 38K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

42

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

17%

  • Sun Zapper32%
  • Zalan15%
  • Dmsky14%
  • Warmify8%
  • Zinka7%
  • Franklin Sports7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (9 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$1K8%$3K12%$4K16%$6K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 101 weeks — +100.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color20%

“Shade match”

Quality-Overall9%

“Its very affordable for the quality”

Suitability Combination Skin8%

“Great for your skin”

Value For Money6%

“Good for the price”

Moist/Dry6%

“Very moisturizing”

Soft Feel5%

“feels good too”

Brightness/Shine/Glow5%

“Nice glow”

Coverage4%

“Great coverage”

Suitability Hot Weather3%

“Nice for summer”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Color13%

“Colors are off”

Oily/Greasy11%

“Looks oily on”

Smell9%

“Smells a little weird”

Allergies4%

“Allergic Reaction”

Moist/Dry4%

“Very drying”

Thickness3%

“Not sheer, thick coverage”

Skin Health3%

“Broke out skin”

Product Condition3%

“Opened and used”

Coverage2%

“Not full coverage so you would need to add make up on top if you want that look”

Quality-Overall2%

“Poor quality”

Top return reasons

Color31%
Product Condition9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Smell8%
Oily/Greasy6%
Coverage3%
Leak-Proof3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Size-Overall2%
Texture/Consistency-Overall2%