Skip to content
60

eye black

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 73Growth 65Conversion 87Competition 38Returns 96Price range 21Avg price 23Brand share 70Review moat 52Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$801K

$801K/yr · 990K searches

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Good+43.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good1,432.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Bad$8.18

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad$3.67–$18.05

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

29%

  • Easton22%
  • Rawlings13%
  • Drip Over Skill10%
  • Franklin Sports9%
  • GoSports9%
  • Dmsky8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$80K20%$160K30%$240K40%$321K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +43.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color27%

“Colors are vibrant”

Quality-Overall14%

“a great variety”

Value For Money13%

“worth the money”

Ease Of Use6%

“super easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“It works as advertised”

Durability3%

“longevity well”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“It cleans up easily in the bath with soap”

Soft Feel3%

“Smooth”

Size-Overall2%

“Good fit”

Efficiency2%

“work pretty well”

What buyers complain about

Color13%

“Eye black. Not black eye.”

Size-Overall9%

“It doesnt fit as described”

Smudge Resistance6%

“smeared on uniforms”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“way worse than the pictures showed”

Ease Of Use5%

“Its hard to remove”

Durability4%

“Broken and Unusable”

Moist/Dry4%

“Dried out”

Stain Resistance4%

“All it did was smear”

Functionality-Overall3%

“Didnt work for us”

Protection3%

“so I dont even think the UV protection is that good”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall21%
Color19%
Defective Material/Parts14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Value For Money7%
Functionality-Overall6%
Adhesion/Stickiness5%
Paint Quality3%
Durability3%
Quality-Overall2%