Skip to content
35

earring card punch

Skip it

A small market ($33K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 8Growth 17Conversion 58Competition 26Returns 47Price range 46Avg price 57Brand share 27Review moat 57Quality gap 58

Conversion

Good5.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,227.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$12.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Okay3.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Okay$5.85–$22.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay70%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-15.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$33K

$33K/yr · 52K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 70% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

17

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • Easy Earring Cards44%
  • Craftask23%
  • yuntop9%
  • CYFUN DESIGN7%
  • Generic6%
  • BENECREAT3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$3K20%$7K30%$10K40%$13K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -15.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use28%

“SO EASY”

Quality-Overall16%

“Great tool”

Size-Overall7%

“I like the smallest size”

Value For Money7%

“Value for money”

Efficiency7%

“Kit worked good”

Grip5%

“easy to grip”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Did the job”

Strength3%

“Very strong”

Paper Compatibility2%

“Works great on paper”

Sharpness2%

“I've used this punch dozens of times now, and it has remained consistent and sharp”

What buyers complain about

Durability21%

“ended up breaking completely”

Paper Quality10%

“These hole punches leave a real crisp hole in paper”

Quality-Overall8%

“Cheap”

Ease Of Use6%

“not so easy to use”

Size-Overall5%

“Small”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Misleading”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Does not work”

Design-Overall3%

“it feels like a bit of a design flaw in the way that the opening is currently”

Value For Money3%

“This is insanely expensive for such a flimsy”

Paper Compatibility3%

“cant cut thru one piece of construction paper”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall37%
Functionality-Overall15%
Defective Material/Parts7%
Value For Money6%
Paper Quality5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Jamming/Clogging2%
Product Condition2%
Durability2%
Quality-Overall2%