Skip to content
56

decoupage napkins

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 59Growth 27Conversion 23Competition 89Returns 93Price range 45Avg price 41Brand share 82Review moat 51Quality gap 30

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great26%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great53%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Market size

Good$472K

$472K/yr · 2.3M searches

Review moat

Good1,442.32

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay$4.03–$23.90

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay$10.96

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+1.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (26% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

43 rising

Sellers

79

Top-5 brand share

53%

Open market

43%

  • NatNarr20%
  • Crtiin13%
  • LSYAHCYY8%
  • Mod Podge7%
  • PRSTINCOL4%
  • Glenmal4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$9K4%$19K6%$28K8%$38K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 79 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +1.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
90K70KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall23%

“They are also very affordable for the quality”

Color15%

“Beautiful colors”

Design-Overall13%

“Great design”

Value For Money7%

“Excellent price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As described”

Ease Of Use5%

“Easy to apply”

Thickness3%

“It goes on smoothly without being too thick”

Paper Quality3%

“The paper is beautiful”

Shape/Style2%

“There are several different styles”

Size-Overall2%

“The perfect size”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“Too small”

Color12%

“Color bleeds”

Thickness9%

“Thick paper”

Quality-Overall7%

“they are of a dull and muted quality”

Value For Money5%

“Seems expensive”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“Yellows and not great as glue either”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Not as advertised”

Paper Quality3%

“thinner than lightweight printer paper”

Functionality-Overall3%

“Total failure”

Smell3%

“The chemical smell is horrible”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall19%
Value For Money14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Color10%
Adhesion/Stickiness5%
Functionality-Overall5%
Leak-Proof5%
Quality-Overall5%
Design-Overall3%
Thin2%