Skip to content
50

cross stitch pattern holder

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (233 avg reviews), but soft demand (-36.8% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 7Conversion 61Competition 54Returns 75Price range 71Avg price 86Brand share 44Review moat 88Quality gap 76

Review moat

Great233.09

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great$19.57

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Great2.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Good$9.09–$29.21

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good53%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad$76K

$76K/yr · 73K searches

Growth

Bad-36.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 53% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

12 falling

Sellers

18

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

18%

  • Dritz31%
  • Flutesan22%
  • Cowenhey12%
  • BABYSHEEP7%
  • Prym6%
  • OSPNIEEK4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 18%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$8K20%$15K30%$23K40%$30K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 23 weeks — -36.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KFeb '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption15%

“strong magnets”

Ease Of Use12%

“Easy to use”

Quality-Overall8%

“Very well made”

Strength7%

“Great stand”

Size-Overall7%

“Just the right size”

Stitch/Finish/Polish6%

“Love it and it helped me to cross stitch”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“product is as advertised”

Value For Money4%

“Great value”

Design-Overall4%

“Good design”

Document Organizing/Classification2%

“Document Holder”

What buyers complain about

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption29%

“Magnets aren't very powerful”

Size-Overall8%

“It's pretty huge”

Strength6%

“Weak Magnets”

Quality-Overall5%

“there are some performance issues”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Misleading ad, it is only a LITTLE BIT of metal, the rest is plastic”

Adhesion/Stickiness2%

“do NOT stay in place”

Thickness2%

“The magnets are too thick for this kind of product”

Defective Material/Parts2%

“Arrived with blue piece clip for middle part broken”

Weight Heavy2%

“its too heavy”

Adjustability/Rotatability/Reclining2%

“it is extremely difficult to adjust”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall33%
Magnetic Strength/Adsorption13%
Defective Material/Parts9%
Functionality-Overall9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Strength4%
Weight Heavy4%
Scratch Resistance2%
Mechanism Issues2%
Quality-Overall2%