Skip to content
61

craft paper

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 17% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 64Growth 20Conversion 38Competition 96Returns 92Price range 55Avg price 57Brand share 96Review moat 57Quality gap 24

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Incredible28%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good$601K

$601K/yr · 1.5M searches

Review moat

Good1,200.19

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$12.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$2.90–$29.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Okay3.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-9.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

89 rising

Sellers

144

Top-5 brand share

28%

Open market

68%

  • MIATTCLD8%
  • PH PERKHOMY7%
  • iKammo7%
  • Neenah4%
  • Fabllewavi3%
  • Vanhench3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$6K2%$12K3%$18K4%$24K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 150 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall15%

“Great quality affordable”

Paper Quality13%

“Beautiful Paper”

Color11%

“Beautiful Colors”

Value For Money7%

“Best value”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Adhesion/Stickiness7%

“Sticks well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Gets the job done”

Design-Overall3%

“Beautiful design”

Thickness3%

“It was thick enough to make birthday cards with”

Size-Overall2%

“Amazing size”

What buyers complain about

Thickness14%

“Not as thick as I would have liked”

Adhesion/Stickiness13%

“bad adhesive”

Size-Overall11%

“Super small”

Paper Quality6%

“Small and paper quality is thin”

Quality-Overall5%

“Low quality”

Durability5%

“Break so easily”

Value For Money5%

“little bit expensive though for what it is”

Color4%

“colors are dull”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“FALSE ADVERTISING”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Didnt work well”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall42%
Value For Money10%
Adhesion/Stickiness7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Color7%
Paper Quality6%
Thin3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Thickness2%
Display Colors2%