Skip to content
53

copper foil tape for stained glass

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.3%), but soft demand (-15.2% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 27Growth 17Conversion 83Competition 57Returns 88Price range 61Avg price 66Brand share 61Review moat 46Quality gap 60

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$13.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$5.98–$28.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good51%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,873.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$114K

$114K/yr · 90K searches

Growth

Bad-15.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 51% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

91

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

26%

  • LOVIMAG22%
  • Kraftex17%
  • YEZHET12%
  • Edco10%
  • Rainbow Art Glass6%
  • Glastined6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$6K10%$11K15%$17K20%$23K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -15.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Adhesion/Stickiness33%

“The adhesive seems quite strong”

Quality-Overall12%

“Always consistent quality”

Value For Money9%

“Fantastic price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As advertised”

Efficiency8%

“Works well”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Durability2%

“Seems to be pretty durable”

Thickness2%

“The foil thickness seems typical for this type of product”

Ease Of Cleaning2%

“Having four rolls keeps the bulk of the supply clean”

Design-Overall2%

“Its design matched its function well. 1 star”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness26%

“not conductive adhesive”

Thickness24%

“Too thin,breaks easily”

Quality-Overall9%

“Low quality”

Ease Of Use4%

“hard to deal with”

Strength4%

“So flimsy it easily tears when you are burnishing your edges”

Tear Resistance4%

“Tears easily”

Value For Money4%

“A Bit more expensive than others”

Color2%

“The color was on the back”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy2%

“The measurements are off”

Heating1%

“It might start to get warm with a full ampere going through it”

Top return reasons

Adhesion/Stickiness26%
Advertised Vs Actual Product22%
Size-Overall11%
Thin7%
Value For Money6%
Color6%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Quality-Overall4%
Functionality-Overall4%
Thickness2%