Skip to content
59

colored cardstock

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 78Growth 23Conversion 77Competition 77Returns 96Price range 70Avg price 75Brand share 38Review moat 43Quality gap 16

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.0M

$1.0M/yr · 887K searches

Conversion

Great7.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$15.11

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.35–$37.62

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,193.64

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-3.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

18 rising

Sellers

88

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

15%

  • Astrobrights37%
  • TUXIYA21%
  • Neenah15%
  • Saccik5%
  • Ftumertly4%
  • 3 otters3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (12 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$30K6%$60K9%$90K12%$120K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 62 weeks — -3.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color27%

“Great variety of colors”

Quality-Overall17%

“the paper quality is nice”

Paper Quality11%

“Sturdy Stock Paper”

Value For Money9%

“Excellent Value”

Thickness7%

“The sheets are thick”

Paper Brightness3%

“Good paper”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As described”

Print Quality2%

“the print quality was excellent for what I was looking for”

Strength2%

“The cardstock itself is sturdy”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Thickness20%

“Not as thick as I expected”

Color14%

“Not white”

Paper Quality11%

“Thin paper not cardstock quality”

Strength4%

“It doesnt feel sturdy enough”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Misleading and disappointing”

Size-Overall2%

“NOT THE LISTED SIZE”

Value For Money2%

“overpriced”

Display Colors2%

“Colors are not true to pictures”

Quality-Overall2%

“Overall, very cheap and not worth the money”

Paper Brightness2%

“I did not actually print with this paper”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall21%
Color17%
Paper Quality15%
Value For Money12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Thin5%
Display Colors3%
Thickness3%
Paper Brightness2%
Paper Compatibility2%