Skip to content
50

cardstock 110 lb

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but soft demand (-0.7% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 51Growth 25Conversion 72Competition 43Returns 98Price range 68Avg price 76Brand share 31Review moat 32Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$15.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$6.93–$31.93

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$288K

$288K/yr · 278K searches

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,309.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-0.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

75

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

10%

  • Neenah50%
  • WritePads11%
  • Astrobrights10%
  • Goefun9%
  • TownStix7%
  • YIXUNHL3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$29K20%$58K30%$86K40%$115K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -0.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Paper Quality20%

“Beautiful paper”

Quality-Overall15%

“the paper quality is nice”

Value For Money9%

“Excellent value”

Thickness7%

“Great thickness for cards”

Color7%

“the colors were vibrant”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As Advertised”

Print Quality5%

“Perfect for Printing”

Weight Light2%

“This is lightweight”

Weight Heavy2%

“Perfect weight for card bases”

Paper Brightness2%

“nice bright white color & smooth paper, prints well”

What buyers complain about

Paper Quality24%

“Very cheap paper”

Thickness23%

“Not as thick as I expected”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Not as advertised”

Color5%

“Color is not true white”

Strength4%

“Too flimsy”

Weight Heavy4%

“Its no way even close to being heavy 110# I immediately tried to request a return”

Thin3%

“Very thin”

Quality-Overall3%

“What I received was a lower quality compared to my first purchase”

Weight Light2%

“Thinner and lighter than advertised”

Print Quality2%

“printing on them is also a nightmare because the color looks completely off”

Top return reasons

Paper Quality29%
Thickness11%
Thin10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Weight Heavy5%
Color5%
Size-Overall4%
Value For Money4%
Compatibility-Overall3%
Paper Compatibility2%