Skip to content
50

boutonniere magnet

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (411 avg reviews), but a small market ($51K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 13Growth 76Conversion 39Competition 50Returns 70Price range 62Avg price 53Brand share 33Review moat 79Quality gap 50

Review moat

Great410.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Great+63.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Good2.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Good$4.19–$32.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$12.39

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad$51K

$51K/yr · 133K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 rising

Sellers

20

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

7%

  • WILLBOND29%
  • Waydress23%
  • QuickClips15%
  • BoutStix10%
  • Colingmill9%
  • Gosknor8%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$2K8%$4K12%$6K16%$8K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +63.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption32%

“Good magnets”

Ease Of Use14%

“Easy to use”

Strength12%

“Strong magnets”

Quality-Overall9%

“Very well made product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Works as advertised”

Value For Money5%

“Price point is worth every penny”

Durability4%

“durability they lasted all”

Adhesion/Stickiness2%

“And they stayed on the shirts really well”

Touch/Button Controls1%

“I got these because I had some buttons that I liked quite a bit”

Efficiency1%

“worked well”

What buyers complain about

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption31%

“The Magnet could be stronger”

Strength13%

“Not strong enough”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“LOOK at the description ABOVE”

Size-Overall8%

“They are long”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“It wont adhere to a peacoat jacket or crocheted items”

Functionality-Overall4%

“they didnt work very well on the mother of the grooms silk dress”

Touch/Button Controls3%

“I was worried that it wasn't going to work since it's a bit recessed on the back of the button”

Durability3%

“Fell off quickly in the night”

Quality-Overall2%

“Not the greatest”

Value For Money2%

“Not worth the money”

Top return reasons

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption31%
Size-Overall29%
Functionality-Overall9%
Strength6%
Value For Money6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Weight Heavy2%
Adhesion/Stickiness2%
Compatibility-Overall1%