Skip to content

body tanning lotion

Skip it34/100

a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 89% of clicks) — body tanning lotion doesn't clear our bar today.

Market/yr

$127K

Growth (1y)

+80.5%

Products

9

Brands

8

was 9 a year ago

Sellers

25

Price range

$5.86–$33.92

Returns

1.6%

Rating

4.4★

34/100

Skip it

Scored 34/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
6
×0.30
Growth
59
×0.30
Competition
1
×0.20
Quality gap
51
×0.10
Returns
87
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 102 weeks — +80.5% year over year.
3K1KSpike '25Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Competition

52%Dritz
  • Dritz52%
  • FITTDYHE23%
  • YHOVID8%
  • ALECPEA6%
  • Clozex3%
  • Aleene's3%
  • Other (2 brands)5%

The top 5 products capture 89% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack. 8 brands and 25 sellers compete here.

Brands

8 falling

was 9 a year ago

Sellers

25

Top 5 brand share

92%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend

Product shelf

All 9 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Adhesion/Stickiness30%

“Strong adhesive”

Ease Of Use13%

“Easy to use”

Quality-Overall12%

“It gives a reliable, durable impression, and overall feels like something you can trust for long-term use”

Efficiency7%

“Excellent - effective”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As Advertised”

Strength4%

“Very strong”

Durability4%

“So far it's holding up very well”

Value For Money3%

“Great value for the money”

Stitch/Finish/Polish2%

“Crystal Clear Finish”

Maintenance And Repair2%

“Great for a variety of repairs”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness33%

“adhesive did not work”

Functionality-Overall14%

“Doesnt work as intended”

Durability6%

“not well enough to last”

Smell5%

“strong smell”

Ease Of Use4%

“Hard to work with”

Value For Money4%

“Its a bit pricey”

Quality-Overall3%

“Poor quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Does not do exactly as described”

Thickness2%

“The gel formula is thick”

Size-Overall2%

“The tube opening is very small”

Top return reasons

  • Adhesion/Stickiness52%
  • Functionality-Overall12%
  • Value For Money9%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
  • Material Quality4%
  • Defective Material/Parts3%
  • Smell2%
  • Leak-Proof2%
  • Size-Overall2%
  • Product Condition2%

Data scraped July 8, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.79 median price · 2.2% median returns across 14,944 tracked niches.