Skip to content
53

blue eye black

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +117.0% this quarter, but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($5.08–$13.49) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 11Growth 95Conversion 92Competition 31Returns 87Price range 0Avg price 21Brand share 43Review moat 68Quality gap 60

Growth

Incredible+117.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Great11.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good774.41

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Bad$7.53

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad$46K

$46K/yr · 53K searches

Price range

Bad$5.08–$13.49

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

15%

  • DALVGFN18%
  • MEICOLY17%
  • CCbeauty17%
  • BADCOLOR14%
  • Wismee14%
  • Franklin Sports6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$2K10%$5K15%$7K20%$9K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +117.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color44%

“The colors are bright”

Quality-Overall13%

“Good quality product the team loves the multi colors”

Value For Money8%

“Super affordable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Just what I wanted”

Soft Feel4%

“go on very creamy”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to use”

Durability3%

“Build up well”

Ease Of Application2%

“Easy application/good variety of colors”

Eco Friendliness2%

“Granddaughter got her teams colors and she was very happy with the application and sustainability”

Efficiency2%

“work pretty well”

What buyers complain about

Color18%

“is not pigmented well”

Durability12%

“Broke off immediately”

Ease Of Use9%

“Hard to get off”

Brightness/Shine/Glow8%

“Im also not a fan of the glitter in it”

Size-Overall6%

“Tiny”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Not as advertised”

Oily/Greasy4%

“are very oily”

Ease Of Cleaning4%

“Face cleanser, make up remover- nothing worked”

Water Resistance3%

“These are not waterproof. which is ok bc I was using them for 6u ball”

Strength3%

“Not durable”

Top return reasons

Color38%
Size-Overall14%
Paint Quality9%
Adhesion/Stickiness7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Functionality-Overall5%
Value For Money4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Durability2%
Stain Resistance2%