Skip to content
58

blue cardstock

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 37Growth 43Conversion 89Competition 69Returns 94Price range 43Avg price 54Brand share 71Review moat 75Quality gap 20

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good510.3

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good$12.52

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+14.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Okay$5.19–$22.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Okay$184K

$184K/yr · 140K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

25 falling

Sellers

97

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

32%

  • FLIPPED26%
  • Astrobrights16%
  • TUXIYA8%
  • Neenah7%
  • WEKOOSE6%
  • Uncle Paul6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$7K8%$15K12%$22K16%$29K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +14.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KHoliday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Color25%

“The colors are bright”

Quality-Overall22%

“the quality feels consistent throughout the pack”

Paper Quality21%

“Great paper”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As described”

Paper Brightness4%

“Good quality paper”

Weight Heavy3%

“its also not a heavy cardstock”

Strength3%

“It isnt flimsy,”

Thickness2%

“Medium thickness a great value for the price”

Value For Money2%

“The quantity is generous”

Drawing Experience2%

“Good for crafting”

What buyers complain about

Paper Quality34%

“Very poor quality several papers damaged paper came out of package”

Color24%

“Color was not accurate”

Thickness19%

“Wrong thickness”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“False advertising”

Quality-Overall4%

“Poor quality overall”

Value For Money4%

“Not a Great Value”

Top return reasons

Color52%
Paper Quality10%
Display Colors8%
Size-Overall5%
Value For Money5%
Paper Brightness4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Thin2%
Quality-Overall2%
Thickness2%