Skip to content
33

blending stump

Skip it

Prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($3.77–$12.73) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 32Growth 14Conversion 90Competition 9Returns 98Price range 0Avg price 20Brand share 13Review moat 29Quality gap 21

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$147K

$147K/yr · 192K searches

Review moat

Okay3,583.75

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Bad$7.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-22.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad95%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Bad89%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Price range

Bad$3.77–$12.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 89% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 falling

Sellers

14

Top-5 brand share

95%

Open market

2%

  • N NOROCME58%
  • Haojiaho14%
  • Jeimier11%
  • STAEDTLER7%
  • FEBSNOW6%
  • yuntop3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$22K30%$44K45%$66K60%$88K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 8 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -22.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '24Prime Day '25Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall19%

“Nice variety”

Advertised Vs Actual Product15%

“Gets job done”

Efficiency15%

“Gets job done”

Value For Money15%

“Value for your money”

Drawing Experience8%

“Allows him to draw on a whole other level”

Ease Of Use8%

“Easy to use”

Size-Overall6%

“The different sizes are very nice”

Durability4%

“havent broken apart like others Ive used”

Fun/Entertainment Experience2%

“Fun to teach my kid how to blend”

Gifting Purpose1%

“Part of an art set gift for my grandaughter”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall29%

“Dont work”

Quality-Overall21%

“I did not find it useful- poor quality stumps”

Strength12%

“some even flimsy”

Durability7%

“shredded before using”

Ease Of Cleaning2%

“Only complaint is that the paper still on the smaller rubber stump did sand off pretty much first cleaning”

Top return reasons

Quality-Overall17%
Functionality-Overall15%
Defective Material/Parts12%
Size-Overall9%
Value For Money9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Material Quality6%
Certifications4%
Gifting Purpose3%
Product Condition3%