Skip to content
54

black cardstock

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (16.8% search→purchase), but strong incumbent ratings (4.7★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 61Growth 47Conversion 98Competition 27Returns 89Price range 58Avg price 37Brand share 47Review moat 70Quality gap 19

Conversion

Incredible16.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good685.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good$528K

$528K/yr · 299K searches

Price range

Good$5.08–$28.61

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+17.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Okay77%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay$10.48

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 rising

Sellers

61

Top-5 brand share

77%

Open market

17%

  • Ciphyfee27%
  • OcePor18%
  • Neenah13%
  • TEETOOKEA13%
  • Glyanlee6%
  • TUXIYA5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$53K20%$106K30%$159K40%$211K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +17.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall24%

“Good quality card stock”

Paper Quality13%

“Excellent paper”

Color12%

“Color is good”

Thickness8%

“it feels like high quality thick cardstock right out of the package”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As described”

Value For Money7%

“Fair price”

Weight Heavy5%

“Heavy and good for my project”

Strength3%

“sturdy”

Ease Of Use3%

“Has come in handy”

Size-Overall2%

“sized right and it is black”

What buyers complain about

Compatibility-Overall7%

“Will NOT work with printers”

Weight Light7%

“A little lighter than the blackest”

Thickness7%

“its not so thick that it creates a struggle for your printer or your laser”

Value For Money5%

“overpriced”

Weight Heavy4%

“Not heavy cardstock”

Nib/Tip Quality4%

“This paper is not smooth like the others, and nibs catch”

Quality-Overall4%

“Cheap”

Cutting/Trimming4%

“Does not work for cricut too cheap for intricate cuts”

Thin4%

“Thin, does not hold up”

Paper Quality2%

“Very black paper I didn't use it my brother”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall20%
Value For Money12%
Paper Quality12%
Color11%
Thickness8%
Thin7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Compatibility-Overall3%
Print Quality3%
Functionality-Overall3%