Skip to content

bead board

Skip it49/100

a small market ($317K/yr) — bead board doesn't clear our bar today.

Market/yr

$317K

Growth (1y)

+220.4%

Products

18

Brands

14

was 11 a year ago

Sellers

23

Price range

$5.78–$84.20

Returns

1.7%

Rating

4.5★

49/100

Skip it

Scored 49/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
16
×0.30
Growth
79
×0.30
Competition
39
×0.20
Quality gap
37
×0.10
Returns
87
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +220.4% year over year.
15K7KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jun '25Oct '25Feb '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Competition

33%The Beadsmith
  • The Beadsmith33%
  • Petoysoso18%
  • HSZCTUY13%
  • INDIVSHOW7%
  • H&W5%
  • TUNQISM4%
  • Other (8 brands)19%

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them. 14 brands and 23 sellers compete here.

Brands

14 rising

was 11 a year ago

Sellers

23

Top 5 brand share

77%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend

Product shelf

All 18 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall14%

“Good quality”

Ease Of Use13%

“It really comes in handy”

Size-Overall13%

“Nice size tray”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“Better than I expected”

Strength8%

“Very sturdy”

Value For Money6%

“Great for the price”

Design-Overall4%

“Great design”

Durability2%

“Durable”

Wood Quality2%

“Well made wood”

Gifting Purpose2%

“I had bought it for a gift”

What buyers complain about

Material Quality17%

“Material was so not what expected”

Strength12%

“It is very weak and pliable”

Size-Overall12%

“Very tiny trays”

Quality-Overall9%

“Low quality”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy8%

“The printed measurements seem to be ever so slightly off”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“Not as advertised”

Durability3%

“It wont last”

Defective Material/Parts3%

“Came with a piece broken off”

Adhesion/Stickiness3%

“Would not hold my beads in place”

Value For Money2%

“Not worth the cost”

Top return reasons

  • Size-Overall38%
  • Material Quality11%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
  • Defective Material/Parts6%
  • Quality-Overall6%
  • Value For Money6%
  • Strength5%
  • Functionality-Overall4%
  • Wood Quality2%
  • Thin1%

Data scraped July 6, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.74 median price · 2.2% median returns across 13,649 tracked niches.