Skip to content
50

9x12 canvas

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (14.1% search→purchase), but strong incumbent ratings (4.7★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 31Growth 20Conversion 96Competition 60Returns 84Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 36Review moat 24Quality gap 18

Conversion

Incredible14.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Incredible$24.31

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.84–$64.28

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay83%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$145K

$145K/yr · 42K searches

Review moat

Bad5,426.78

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-10.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

12

Top-5 brand share

83%

Open market

11%

  • ESRICH43%
  • Simetufy19%
  • BAKEYBA10%
  • KEFF7%
  • FIXSMITH5%
  • PHOENIX5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$7K10%$15K15%$22K20%$29K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -10.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall33%

“These are well-made”

Value For Money20%

“these were affordable”

Paint Quality11%

“take paint very well specially for acrylics”

Material Quality7%

“Nice material”

Size-Overall6%

“it helps re-size”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As described”

Efficiency4%

“Works well”

Design-Overall2%
Ease Of Cleaning2%
Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“Amazing texture”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall21%

“Bigger”

Quality-Overall14%

“Not great in the quality department”

Strength14%

“The boards were flimsy”

Thickness14%

“Thin”

Smell7%

“the canvas board has a strong chemical smell”

Functionality-Overall7%

“Not for showing my work”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“No one mentioned this”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Thin8%
Frame Quality7%
Value For Money7%
Material Quality7%
Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%
Thickness3%
Quality-Overall2%
Paint Quality2%