Skip to content
48

13x19 paper

Skip it

Soft demand (-19.9% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 29Growth 15Conversion 59Competition 68Returns 93Price range 65Avg price 95Brand share 30Review moat 50Quality gap 22

Avg price

Incredible$45.83

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good$13.79–$144.20

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,498.71

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$127K

$127K/yr · 55K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-19.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

67

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

7%

  • KOALA PAPER24%
  • Goefun24%
  • Hammermill23%
  • Accent8%
  • OcePor7%
  • Desktop Publishing Supplies6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$5K8%$10K12%$15K16%$20K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 28 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -19.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Paper Quality34%

“Great paper”

Quality-Overall23%

“Consistent quality with a clean matte finish”

Thickness9%

“the thickness is as expected”

Print Quality6%

“Prints well through an Epson WF-7840”

Stitch/Finish/Polish4%

“Loved the glossy finish”

Value For Money3%

“Very good value”

Paper Brightness3%

“I also like that fingerprints arent as noticeable compared to glossy paper”

Double-Sided Printing1%

“It really is double-sided”

Smudge Resistance1%

“Worked fine in a laser printer, the quality was immaculate and didnt smear”

Brightness/Shine/Glow1%

“Bright and Beautiful”

What buyers complain about

Paper Quality33%

“Cheap paper = Cheap results”

Thickness11%

“A little thinner than the 300 gsm I usually order”

Smudge Resistance8%

“For photo prints didnt work for me curling and smearing”

Compatibility-Overall5%

“it doesnt fit in my printer”

Paper Compatibility4%

“the paper just won't feed through it”

Color4%

“My Canon Pro310, brand new, using this paper, the red looked fuzzy”

Moist/Dry3%

“it still didnt dry”

Value For Money3%

“only a better price”

Strength3%

“Is flimsy”

Product Condition3%

“Honestly it looked like it was used”

Top return reasons

Paper Quality34%
Size-Overall30%
Compatibility-Overall8%
Paper Compatibility4%
Value For Money3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Thickness2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Print Quality2%
Quality-Overall2%