Skip to content
50

12x12 scrapbook album

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($20.02 avg), but weak search conversion (1.5%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 31Growth 34Conversion 19Competition 85Returns 63Price range 70Avg price 88Brand share 66Review moat 51Quality gap 23

Avg price

Great$20.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$9.44–$27.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good1,452.46

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+7.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$143K

$143K/yr · 484K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

29%

  • Mublalbum28%
  • Hiwhy13%
  • potricher10%
  • 1DOT27%
  • MCS6%
  • Lanpn6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$4K6%$9K9%$13K12%$17K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 59 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +7.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall22%

“Excellent Quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As advertised”

Value For Money8%

“The price was very reasonable”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Size-Overall7%

“Nice size”

Durability5%

“Cute and durable”

Collectibles5%

“Very nice scrapbook, well made, big and roomy”

Color4%

“Color was nice”

Strength3%

“Well built”

Image/Picture Clarity3%

“Pictures work well in photo album”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall26%

“dimensions are wrong”

Strength9%

“This came a bit bent”

Quality-Overall7%

“Cheaply made not good quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“The pages arent as big as advertised”

Value For Money5%

“The value for the money is not as good as I would have hoped because I could not find matching pages for it”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“Not a fan of the adhesive quality”

Ease Of Use4%

“it can be a bit difficult to peel back the covering to place the photographs”

Durability3%

“Just dont expect it to hold up that well”

Material Quality3%

“And hands on cloth over the years may not fair out well”

Locking Mechanism2%

“The ring mechanism was already loose from the spine, and the rings were misaligned, making it difficult to open and close properly”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall56%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Color6%
Value For Money5%
Adhesion/Stickiness4%
Quality-Overall3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Material Quality2%
Thickness1%
Thin1%