Skip to content
43

11x17 portfolio

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 94% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 32Growth 25Conversion 59Competition 51Returns 64Price range 60Avg price 95Brand share 15Review moat 60Quality gap 23

Avg price

Incredible$31.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Good2.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good1,083.03

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$7.78–$149.32

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$146K

$146K/yr · 92K searches

Growth

Bad-0.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 flat

Sellers

70

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

4%

  • ITOYA64%
  • Sooez17%
  • Dunwell9%
  • JoyCat2%
  • Dynta2%
  • Nicpro2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$7K10%$15K15%$22K20%$29K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -0.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall27%

“Overall a quality binder”

Size-Overall11%

“Good fit”

Storage Capacity10%

“is able to storage so much”

Value For Money10%

“Great deal”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“Arrived as advertised”

Strength6%

“The cover is sturdy”

Ease Of Use4%

“Top loading, and easy to insert art”

Durability3%

“This is extremely durable”

Document Organizing/Classification2%

“These preservation / presentation books are fantastic as easy to store scrapbooks”

Drawing Experience2%

“Best art portfolio around”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“Inacurate sizing”

Quality-Overall7%

“Poor quality, detached from spine”

Print Quality5%

“Badly creased”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Doesn't hold 11x17" posters as claimed.”

Fastener Quality5%

“buckles when stood up”

Strength5%

“Not sturdy enough”

Defective Material/Parts5%

“Received damaged item twice”

Functionality-Overall5%

“This product has failed at the one job it's supposed to do”

Storage Capacity5%

“you cannot stand it up to store anywhere”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“Glue is very hard to remove”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall72%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Material Quality3%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Value For Money2%
Scratch Resistance2%
Weight Heavy2%
Strength2%
Quality-Overall2%
Functionality-Overall1%