Skip to content

egg carrier

Skip it48/100

a small market ($139K/yr) — egg carrier doesn't clear our bar today.

Market/yr

$139K

Growth (1y)

+209.5%

Products

27

Brands

22

was 14 a year ago

Sellers

73

Price range

$3.65–$29.65

Returns

1.9%

Rating

4.5★

48/100

Skip it

Scored 48/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
7
×0.30
Growth
78
×0.30
Competition
49
×0.20
Quality gap
44
×0.10
Returns
85
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +209.5% year over year.
6K3KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jun '25Oct '25Feb '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.1×

Competition

23%Coghlan's
  • Coghlan's23%
  • ZPU15%
  • LonlyEagle15%
  • Camco10%
  • JAMOR8%
  • HYLCWTH4%
  • Other (16 brands)26%

The top 5 products take 57% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them. 22 brands and 73 sellers compete here.

Brands

22 rising

was 14 a year ago

Sellers

73

Top 5 brand share

71%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend
9LocknLock$12.954.7★7,3604%falling

Product shelf

All 27 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall15%

“Nice product, looks nice, cleans easy,stores well”

Storage Capacity11%

“Neat storage capacity”

Ease Of Use10%

“Easy to use”

Size-Overall9%

“Great size”

Value For Money8%

“Worth it”

Strength7%

“The container feels sturdy”

Durability7%

“Very durable feeling”

Portability5%

“good at carrying eggs”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Works as advertised”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“easy to wash”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“Eggs don't fit”

Durability11%

“Broken on first use”

Dishwasher Safe11%

“NOT dishwasher safe”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor quality”

Strength8%

“The plastic is a bit flimsy”

Ease Of Use5%

“Honestly these are a pain to use”

Material Quality5%

“Very cheap/thin plastic”

Smell3%

“Not smell proof”

Functionality-Overall2%

“they are not as functional as I thought they would be”

Sharpness2%

“Sharp plastic edges”

Top return reasons

  • Size-Overall56%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
  • Value For Money6%
  • Material Quality6%
  • Functionality-Overall3%
  • Strength3%
  • Ease Of Use3%
  • Quality-Overall2%
  • Durability2%
  • Mechanism Issues2%

Data scraped July 6, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.74 median price · 2.3% median returns across 14,634 tracked niches.