Skip to content
69

zeckenmittel für katzen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 68Growth 95Conversion 70Competition 23Returns 100Price range 80Avg price 89Brand share 29Review moat 57Quality gap 94

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+128.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€20.79

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€6.22–€52.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€698K

€698K/yr · 530K searches

Review moat

Good1,202.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

8%

  • FRONTLINE28%
  • AdTab25%
  • beaphar20%
  • Redisan8%
  • Animal Vita7%
  • Hello Animal5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€70K20%€140K30%€210K40%€279K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +128.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 21.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit21%

“Handhabung der Pipetten ist einfach”

Geruch16%

“guter Geruch”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Produkt”

Haustierfreundlich11%

“Gut für das Tier”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Erfüllt den Zweck”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Billig”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%

“ist frei von unnötigen Zusatzstoffen”

Komfort insgesamt3%

“Sehr angenehm”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Hält wirklich gut”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt58%

“Absolut unwirksam”

Geruch12%

“Ölig, stinkt, Fellausfall”

Allergien6%

“Löst starken Juckreiz aus”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Absoluter Müll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Schade ums Geld”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Halsband direkt am ersten Tag verloren”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Unbrauchbar”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt2%

“Wirkstoff nicht vorhanden, trotz Halsband genau so viele wie ohne Halsband”

Stärke1%

“die sollbruchstellen waren zu dünn ausgelegt”

Schärfe0%

“scharfe Kanten”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt57%
Geruch7%
Gesamtgröße4%
Fluchtsicher4%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Abgestanden/verfault/verwöhnt2%
Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken2%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%