Skip to content
61

ulmenrinde für hunde

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 60Growth 55Conversion 95Competition 22Returns 100Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 32Review moat 70Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Incredible€23.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€11.45–€39.97

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good716.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€500K

€500K/yr · 174K searches

Growth

Good+27.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

10%

  • MEDIDOG27%
  • ReaVET26%
  • AniForte16%
  • kaer basic12%
  • Tjure5%
  • cdVet4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€50K20%€100K30%€150K40%€200K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +27.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt24%

“Super Produkt”

Haustierfreundlich16%

“Tierliebhaber”

Beruhigend/Zahnen9%

“Funktioniert super, Sodbrennen wurde sehr Schnell besser bei den Hunden”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“Dem Hund schmeckt's”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hält, was es verspricht”

Geruch6%

“riecht auch nicht mehr aus dem Maul = klare Kaufempfehlung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Preis Leistung okay”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%

“Das Pulver ist mega”

Geschmack3%

“Wirksam und lecker”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Unschöne Preiserhöhungen”

Geruch15%

“Stinkende Drops”

Verdauungsstörungen14%

“Erbrochen und Blut im Stuhl”

Funktionalität insgesamt11%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Allergien9%

“Sie hat einige Allergien”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“Geschmack fragwürdig”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Verzehrempfehlung irreführend”

Geschmack4%

“Schlimmer Geschmack”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt1%

“Schade, denn die Zusammensetzung klang eigentlich vielversprechend”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“das ist absolut unmöglich in sein Futter unterzumischen.”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt50%
Geschmack insgesamt50%