Skip to content
58

royal canin gastrointestinal

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 77Growth 22Conversion 62Competition 82Returns 100Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 66Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€35.80

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€9.19–€90.59

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great33%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Market size

Great€955K

€955K/yr · 486K searches

Review moat

Good853.6

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-5.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (33% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

57

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • ROYAL CANIN98%
  • Our Pet Village1%
  • Royal Canin Veterinary Diet1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€29K6%€57K9%€86K12%€115K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 72 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 57 weeks — -5.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Haustierfreundlich28%

“Lebensretter für meinen Kater”

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Super Ware”

Geschmack insgesamt14%

“Schmeckt”

Feucht/Trocken6%

“Super leckeres Trockenfutter”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preis in Ordnung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Produkt wie gewohnt”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Geschmack3%

“Schmackhaftes Futter”

Geruch3%

“Riecht gut”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Gut verträglich”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis31%

“Teures Futter”

Verdauungsstörungen13%

“Juckreiz in Höchstform”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Die Stückchen sind nicht so groß”

Feucht/Trocken6%

“Trocken Futter”

Allergien5%

“Für meine Allergikerin leider ein Schuss in den Ofen”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Schmeckt meinem Tier nicht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Kaum zu öffnen”

Rost/Korrodieren3%

“habe das Futter jetzt zum 2. Mal bestellt und was soll ich sagen 12 dosen alle verrostet und müffeln”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“dieses Nassfutter wurde mir bei Amazon nicht angezeigt.”

Auslaufsicher3%

“hat die Dosen sehr warm und undicht gemacht”