Skip to content
58

hypoallergenes hundefutter

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 76Growth 21Conversion 81Competition 64Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 70Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€41.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible€16.41–€90.59

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great8.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€931K

€931K/yr · 265K searches

Review moat

Good680.64

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-8.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

4 falling

Sellers

56

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • ROYAL CANIN83%
  • Josera9%
  • Green Petfood7%
  • Wolfsblut1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€37K8%€75K12%€112K16%€149K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -8.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Allergien25%

“Bestes Allergie-Futter für uns”

Haustierfreundlich17%

“Hund mag es sehr”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

Geschmack insgesamt10%

“Schmeckt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“super Preis”

Geruch4%

“Toller Duft”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“Gutes Trockenfutter”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Gut bekömmlich”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Gut verträglich”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“man kann es im Sommer wunderbar ins Wasser werfen, weil es nicht unter geht.”

What buyers complain about

Allergien29%

“Futter für Allergiehund”

Geruch9%

“Nachteil des Futters ist der Geruch”

Verdauungsstörungen9%

“Juckreiz in Höchstform”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“erhöhte Kosten”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“schmeckte aber offenbar ungefähr so aufregend wie ein Stück Pappe mit Inhaltsstoffliste.”

Geschmack3%

“Nur leider die Leckerchen der Sorte nicht”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Leider hat mein Hund es nicht vertragen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Es ist zwar so angegeben auf der Verpackung als wieder verschließbar, stimmt aber nicht”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Dann nur noch erbrechen”

Griff2%

“Hände weg”